Appellate practice is a different discipline from trial work. Records are closed. Issues have to be preserved. Argument is on the page first and at the lectern second. The firm has been doing this work since the start of Attorney Zinger's career as an Assistant Public Defender.
The firm represents clients in appeals before the Illinois Appellate Court, the Illinois Supreme Court, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Matters range from criminal direct appeals and post-conviction appeals to civil rights and ERISA appeals. The work begins with the record and ends with oral argument, with everything in between built on a thorough read of what actually happened below.
One of the most common misconceptions about appeals is that they are a second chance to argue the facts. They are not. Appellate courts review the trial court's record for legal error. They do not reweigh evidence, second-guess credibility findings, or take new testimony. The questions are whether the law was correctly applied, whether the trial court abused its discretion, and whether constitutional rights were respected.
Appellate courts will not consider issues that were not preserved in the trial court. That means objections that should have been made, motions that should have been filed, and arguments that should have been put on the record at the right time. Cases are routinely lost on appeal because the issue was forfeited below. The firm reviews the trial record with preservation in mind from page one and identifies what is actually reviewable.
Different issues are reviewed under different standards. Pure questions of law are reviewed de novo. Factual findings are reviewed for clear error. Discretionary rulings on evidentiary or scheduling matters are reviewed for abuse of discretion. The standard of review often dictates how an appeal is briefed. A brief that ignores the standard, no matter how well written, rarely wins. The firm leads with the standard and structures the argument around it.
An appellate brief is the most important document in the case. It is read by judges who have other cases competing for attention. The argument has to be clear in the first paragraph, supported by the right authorities, and tied to the record citations a reader can verify. The firm spends substantial time on briefs, often through multiple full revisions, because nothing else in appellate practice matters more.
Oral argument matters most in close cases. The firm prepares for argument by moot-court testing the questions the panel is most likely to ask, identifying the weakest points in the appellant's brief, and developing concession lines that preserve the case while answering honestly. Most appeals are won on the briefs. The ones that are not are won by lawyers who can think on their feet without losing the thread of the argument.
If you have a case in which an appeal is being considered, the firm welcomes a conversation about the record, the issues, and the realistic chances of success on review.
Every case begins with a private conversation. Reach out to the firm to share what happened and find out what options may be available under Illinois and federal law.
Schedule a Consultation